{"qid": "q01", "subject": "claude", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on how many small businesses in Poland invest in SEO? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:37:55Z", "secs": 28.9, "text": "I couldn't find a recent, credible statistic on the share of Polish small businesses that invest in SEO. Two searches, one in English and one in Polish, turned up nothing direct. I wouldn't put a number on the slide as \"Poland SEO investment\" without a source that says it.\n\nThese are the closest figures I found, and each measures something different from SEO spending:\n\n- **38% of Polish SMEs see a need to improve their online visibility.** This comes from a 2025 digitalization report by home.pl, covered by [Spider's Web](https://spidersweb.pl/2025/04/digitalizacja-sektora-msp-home-pl.html). It measures perceived need, not spending. I only saw the search snippet, not the full report, so check it before using it.\n- **37.5% of small businesses in Poland had no website of their own.** This is from a 2019 report covered by [Wiadomości Handlowe](https://www.wiadomoscihandlowe.pl/artykul/priorytetem-polskich-msp-jest-pozyskiwanie-nowych-klientow-raport). It's dated, and it's about website ownership, not SEO.\n- **Fewer than half of micro and small firms report any investment spending.** This is from [Pekao's SME report, via Bank.pl](https://bank.pl/?p=278226). It covers investment in general, not SEO or marketing.\n\nThe only SEO-specific benchmark I found is from the US, not Poland. [Visual Objects/Clutch (2022)](https://clutch.co/visualobjects/seo/blog/small-business-seo-2022) found that 47% of small businesses weren't investing in SEO. That is a US figure, so I wouldn't present it as Polish data.\n\nFor the slide, the 38% visibility-need figure is the most defensible Poland-specific number. Label it as \"SMEs who see a need to improve online visibility,\" not as SEO investment. I can also try to find the original home.pl report to confirm the wording and sample size.\n\nSources:\n- [Spider's Web: Digitalizacja sektora MŚP w Polsce](https://spidersweb.pl/2025/04/digitalizacja-sektora-msp-home-pl.html)\n- [Wiadomości Handlowe: 2019 report on Polish SMEs](https://www.wiadomoscihandlowe.pl/artykul/priorytetem-polskich-msp-jest-pozyskiwanie-nowych-klientow-raport)\n- [Bank.pl: Pekao SME report](https://bank.pl/?p=278226)\n- [Visual Objects/Clutch: Small Business SEO 2022](https://clutch.co/visualobjects/seo/blog/small-business-seo-2022)", "model_version": "claude-sonnet-5-5,claude-haiku-5-5", "num_turns": 3, "cwd": "t-i8j2b2eo", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "c2ec4a58424a5e221c10f63b827ec247cf8ee1fbe1441d939d5a171995fdbf29"}
{"qid": "q01", "subject": "gpt", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on how many small businesses in Poland invest in SEO? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:37:55Z", "secs": 32.0, "text": "A strong recent statistic is:\n\n**19% of Polish microbusinesses invest in SEO and content marketing.**\n\nIt comes from an October 2025 nationwide survey of 507 Polish microbusinesses—firms employing up to nine people—conducted by IMAS International for NFG. Note that the survey groups SEO and content marketing together rather than measuring SEO alone.\n\nSource: [NFG survey summary](https://nfg.pl/blog/marketingowy-survival-jak-najmniejsze-firmy-w-pol) and the [19% result reported by XYZ](https://xyz.pl/dzieje-sie/ponad-polowa-mikrofirm-w-polsce-prowadzi-dzialania-reklamowe-2655).", "model_version": "gpt-5.6-sol", "search_queries": 5, "cwd": "t-v88tph3u", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "3e516e4a5eac6eb5a96cb2927b80782e9249f7284ca2873b4bd441bf8002a04e"}
{"qid": "q02", "subject": "claude", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on what share of people in Brazil shop online? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:37:55Z", "secs": 22.6, "text": "**52.7% of Brazilian internet users bought or ordered products or services online in 2025.** That's up from 47.9% in 2024. It's the first time the share has passed half of users since the series began.\n\nThe figure comes from IBGE's PNAD TIC 2025 household survey. IBGE is Brazil's national statistics agency.\n\nSource: [Tribuna do Sertão, reporting on the IBGE PNAD TIC 2025 release](https://tribunadosertao.com.br/financas/2026/07/02/932828-mais-da-metade-dos-usuarios-ja-fazem-compras-pela-internet-no-brasil-mostra-pesquisa-do-ibge)\n\nPoder360 also covered the release ([link](https://www.poder360.com.br/poder-tech/mais-da-metade-dos-brasileiros-usam-internet-para-compras-diz-ibge/)), but I couldn't open it to check it.\n\n- **Wording on the slide:** The base is internet users, not the whole population. Write \"52.7% of Brazilian internet users\" rather than \"52.7% of Brazilians\".\n- **Primary source:** The link is a news article, not IBGE itself. For a client deck, you may want to cite IBGE's own PNAD TIC release. I didn't find it directly.", "model_version": "claude-sonnet-5-5,claude-haiku-5-5", "num_turns": 4, "cwd": "t-vvq269_s", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "64117c623e2a32df2e7d622f6e8c892190f272965bd606f8ee87a1dae2304aed"}
{"qid": "q02", "subject": "gpt", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on what share of people in Brazil shop online? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:37:55Z", "secs": 17.6, "text": "A strong recent figure is: **52.7% of Brazilian internet users aged 10+ bought or ordered goods or services online in 2025.**\n\nSlide-ready wording: **“More than half (53%) of Brazil’s internet users shop online.”**\n\nSource: [Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), 2025 data](https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/en/agencia-news/2184-news-agency/news/47473-proporcao-de-usuarios-da-internet-no-pais-ultrapassou-90-da-populacao-de-10-anos-ou-mais-em-2033)\n\nNote that the denominator is internet users, not Brazil’s entire population.", "model_version": "gpt-5.6-sol", "search_queries": 2, "cwd": "t-8l5upeoo", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "646bea92eb1f49dc5914aded304d4f1fa6b3f22c7bd1c30508ad4e8217ff02ce"}
{"qid": "q03", "subject": "claude", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on how many marketers in Germany use content marketing? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:37:55Z", "secs": 34.8, "text": "I couldn't find a recent, reliable figure for the share of German marketers using content marketing, so I don't have a number I'd put on a client slide yet.\n\n- **Bitkom (Feb 2026):** The [Bitkom marketing study](https://www.bitkom.org/sites/main/files/2026-02/bitkom-studie-marketing-im-digitalen-wandel-zwischen-effizienz-automatisierung-und-wettbewerb-2026.pdf) is the most recent source I found. A search snippet suggested it has content marketing figures (63% and 51%). The PDF wouldn't open as readable text, so I couldn't check what those numbers measure. They may not be adoption rates, so please don't cite them until you've opened the PDF yourself.\n- **CM-Entscheider-Studie (around 2025):** [ECIN's summary](https://www.ecin.de/news/cm-entscheider-studie-budgets-fuer-content-marketing-steigen) says 48% of companies have a content marketing strategy. This is the closest usable stat. It measures having a strategy, not using content marketing, and I only saw it in a secondary summary. I'm also not certain of its date.\n- **Older data:** The [Statista/CMF study from 2019](https://lout.plus/Analysen/Content_Marketing_Studie_CMF.html) found that 33% of B2B firms pursue a content marketing strategy. That's too old for a client slide.\n\nIf you cite the 48% figure, phrase it as \"48% of German companies have a content marketing strategy\" and confirm the year and sample in the original study first. For a firmer number, check Statista or the Deutscher Marketing Verband's content marketing studies. I can dig into either if you like.\n\nSources:\n- [Bitkom: Marketing im digitalen Wandel (2026)](https://www.bitkom.org/sites/main/files/2026-02/bitkom-studie-marketing-im-digitalen-wandel-zwischen-effizienz-automatisierung-und-wettbewerb-2026.pdf)\n- [ECIN: CM-Entscheider-Studie](https://www.ecin.de/news/cm-entscheider-studie-budgets-fuer-content-marketing-steigen)\n- [Content Marketing in Deutschland: Status quo](https://lout.plus/Analysen/Content_Marketing_Studie_CMF.html)", "model_version": "claude-sonnet-5-5,claude-haiku-5-5", "num_turns": 4, "cwd": "t-01lreszl", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "f8d0c5fc22d29eeae89f96f1aaf704fcb06d3d878cbc6b5a0c67b094de23e416"}
{"qid": "q03", "subject": "gpt", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on how many marketers in Germany use content marketing? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:37:55Z", "secs": 30.7, "text": "A strong recent figure is **87%**: surveyed German digital-sector companies use content marketing internally, externally, or both.\n\nSource: [Bitkom, *Marketing im digitalen Wandel 2026*, p. 14](https://www.bitkom.org/sites/main/files/2026-02/bitkom-studie-marketing-im-digitalen-wandel-zwischen-effizienz-automatisierung-und-wettbewerb-2026.pdf)\n\nSlide wording: **“87% of surveyed digital-sector companies in Germany use content marketing.”**\n\nThe survey covered 180 companies in late 2025 and is not nationally representative.", "model_version": "gpt-5.6-sol", "search_queries": 4, "cwd": "t-ughhlb5n", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "838e324035952f408223a2d2ed0d8f3b6a26e2e5171d3d9b7e2da9f625e5083c"}
{"qid": "q04", "subject": "claude", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on how much time people in Nigeria spend on social media each day? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:38:18Z", "secs": 35.9, "text": "I checked the sources, and the newest figure I could verify is from January 2024, so it's a bit dated for a slide.\n\n**Best verified figure: about 3 hours 23 minutes a day on social media** in Nigeria. That ranked 5th globally. The data is from We Are Social, January 2024, and covers internet users aged 16 to 64.\n\nSource: [Intelpoint, \"As of January 2024, Nigeria ranked 5th globally for average time spent on social media daily\"](https://intelpoint.co/insights/as-of-january-2024-nigeria-ranked-5th-globally-for-average-time-spent-on-social-media-daily)\n\n- **Secondary source, not the original report:** Intelpoint is citing We Are Social, not publishing the data itself. If the client is picky, trace it back to the original We Are Social/DataReportal report.\n- **I couldn't find a 2025 or 2026 number:** DataReportal's [Digital 2026: Nigeria](https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2026-nigeria) page doesn't show daily social media time. The slide should say \"2024\" so it doesn't look current.\n- **Ignore the 3 hours 58 minutes figure:** It appears in [TechRound](https://techround.co.uk/news/people-spending-850-hours-social-media/), but that article is from June 2023, so it's older and not a good choice.\n- **Channels TV list:** I couldn't open [Channels TV's full country list](https://www.channelstv.com/2024/11/04/full-list-nigeria-ranks-fifth-globally-in-daily-social-media-usage), so I haven't checked it myself.\n\nSuggested slide wording: \"Nigerians spend ~3 hrs 23 min a day on social media (We Are Social, Jan 2024).\"\n\nI can look for a newer figure from the full Digital 2025 or 2026 global reports if you'd like.\n\nSources:\n- [Intelpoint](https://intelpoint.co/insights/as-of-january-2024-nigeria-ranked-5th-globally-for-average-time-spent-on-social-media-daily)\n- [DataReportal Digital 2026: Nigeria](https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2026-nigeria)\n- [TechRound](https://techround.co.uk/news/people-spending-850-hours-social-media/)", "model_version": "claude-sonnet-5-5,claude-haiku-5-5", "num_turns": 6, "cwd": "t-307emai5", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "bb71cfd267f67cbcdc2cf7ebd07c4549097fa5754efe46806c062185c9454340"}
{"qid": "q04", "subject": "gpt", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on how much time people in Nigeria spend on social media each day? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:38:13Z", "secs": 10.4, "text": "Nigerian internet users aged 16+ spent an average of **3 hours 25 minutes per day** on social media.\n\nSource: [Digital 2025 Global Overview Report, p. 367](https://learn.meltwater.com/rs/814-WJU-189/images/2025_Kepios_Digital_Global_Overview_Report.pdf) — GWI survey data from Q3 2024, published February 2025.", "model_version": "gpt-5.6-sol", "search_queries": 1, "cwd": "t-e8jy4y_5", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "d25418572e6f564cabf07e1e935bae54603224231619d0d6397034d8a6b52bc8"}
{"qid": "q05", "subject": "claude", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on the online shopping cart abandonment rate? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:38:24Z", "secs": 15.7, "text": "**Stat for your slide:** about **70%** of online shopping carts are abandoned. Baymard Institute's average across 49 studies is **70.19%**. A later version of the same page shows **70.22%**, updated September 22, 2025.\n\n**Source:** [Baymard Institute, \"Average Documented Online Shopping Cart Abandonment Rate\"](https://baymard.com/lists/cart-abandonment-rate)\n\n- **Check the live page before you present.** The decimals differ between versions, so copy the exact number from the page as it reads now. Rounding to \"~70%\" is safe.\n- **Device split.** Secondary sites citing Baymard report mobile at 85.65%, tablet at 80.74% and desktop at 73.07%. I didn't confirm these on Baymard's page.\n- **Avoid the reasons-for-abandonment figures.** Third-party sites give conflicting numbers, so I wouldn't put them on a slide without checking Baymard directly.\n\nSources:\n- [Baymard Institute: cart abandonment rate](https://baymard.com/lists/cart-abandonment-rate)", "model_version": "claude-sonnet-5-5,claude-haiku-5-5", "num_turns": 2, "cwd": "t-0_9yvy66", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "481ee480a46cf6e2d0a67af6d36ea3a3ca21787c0e1d86d5a6dc44f4d8d47825"}
{"qid": "q05", "subject": "gpt", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on the online shopping cart abandonment rate? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:38:23Z", "secs": 8.6, "text": "A strong slide-ready statistic:\n\n**70.22% of online shopping carts are abandoned before purchase—roughly 7 in 10.**\n\nSource: [Baymard Institute, 2026](https://baymard.com/blog/cart-abandonment-rate), based on an average of 50 ecommerce studies published through 2025.", "model_version": "gpt-5.6-sol", "search_queries": 1, "cwd": "t-zu25vlsm", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "a9d4e00a0449004ad478ddc2e78dd0c025c68f2a65ce640c656a721be7257633"}
{"qid": "q06", "subject": "claude", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on what share of websites run on WordPress? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:38:30Z", "secs": 10.2, "text": "**WordPress runs on 39.4% of all websites.** Among sites with a known CMS, it has a 58.1% share.\n\nSource: W3Techs, \"Usage statistics and market share of WordPress\", dated 8 November 2026: https://w3techs.com/technologies/details/cm-wordpress\n\nFor the slide, use \"39.4% of all websites\" and cite \"W3Techs, November 2026\". Don't mix it up with the 58.1% figure. That one only counts sites where a CMS was detected, so it's a different claim.", "model_version": "claude-sonnet-5-5,claude-haiku-5-5", "num_turns": 2, "cwd": "t-nqqqr6c3", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "d376e0df46d95572b77236e49c814909fc0d52e002d30f49922671b003c33664"}
{"qid": "q06", "subject": "gpt", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on what share of websites run on WordPress? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:38:26Z", "secs": 15.1, "text": "As of 8 November 2026, WordPress runs **39.4% of all websites**—roughly **two in five**.\n\nSource: [W3Techs — WordPress usage statistics](https://w3techs.com/technologies/details/cm-wordpress)\n\nSlide-ready wording: **“WordPress powers nearly 40% of the web.”**", "model_version": "gpt-5.6-sol", "search_queries": 2, "cwd": "t-6nkbfx08", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "3061959d866c52a251ebdbd5d8646fb611f733bfc13fd3be84e9a560b0ec9e54"}
{"qid": "q07", "subject": "claude", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on how many B2B buyers read blog content before they buy? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:38:40Z", "secs": 27.1, "text": "The best-documented number is **71%**. In Demand Gen Report's 2018 Content Preferences Survey, 71% of B2B buyers said they consumed blog content during their purchase process. That was up from 66% the year before.\n\nThis isn't recent. It's from 2018, and I couldn't find a newer blog-specific figure from the same survey series. If the slide needs \"recent,\" the safest wording is \"In a Demand Gen Report survey, 71% of B2B buyers…\" with the 2018 date on the slide. Don't present it as current.\n\n**Source:** [Demand Gen Report, B2B Content Preferences Survey](https://www.demandgenreport.com/industry-news/b2b-content-preferences-survey-buyers-want-short-visual-mobile-optimized-content/22396/). [Smart Insights](https://www.smartinsights.com/b2b-digital-marketing/b2b-strategy/b2b-buyer-journey-and-content-preferences-2018/) reports the same figure.\n\nOther surveys give lower numbers because they measure different things:\n- A [Clutch survey](https://clutch.co/brand-identity/how-b2b-audiences-engage-business-content-online) found 33% of respondents had read blogs or articles in the last week.\n- In the same Clutch survey, 42% used blogs at the awareness stage, falling to 18% at the interest stage.\n\nI couldn't verify a 2025 or 2026 blog-post percentage. Demand Gen Report's 2025 benchmark survey page, which I found, didn't show one. Their 2022 edition ranks blog posts behind webinars, e-books and research reports, but the chart text was garbled and I couldn't read the exact percentage. If you need a fresher number, check demandgenreport.com for the latest Content Preferences report.", "model_version": "claude-sonnet-5-5,claude-haiku-5-5", "num_turns": 3, "cwd": "t-d8_163q4", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "4e85f7d7e35a3934b52d5c419128521fd27af17e3cca5d51c3701e713d8d31cc"}
{"qid": "q07", "subject": "gpt", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on how many B2B buyers read blog content before they buy? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:38:27Z", "secs": 18.9, "text": "A strong recent figure: **67% of B2B buyers said short-form content—including blog posts—was valuable in their decision-making process.**\n\nSource: [Demand Gen Report, 2024 Content Preferences Benchmark Survey](https://www.demandgenreport.com/resources/navigating-the-attention-economy-via-snack-able-shareable-content/47367/)\n\nSlide wording: **“67% of B2B buyers value short-form content such as blog posts when making purchase decisions.”**\n\nNote: This is broader than blogs alone; the commonly cited blog-specific figure—71%—dates back to 2018, so I wouldn’t present it as recent.", "model_version": "gpt-5.6-sol", "search_queries": 2, "cwd": "t-oy0btmqn", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "06113215d7d36d3f1b3388908a1fc1e8c53e1c70acdbd4fed6d0f5fb93bb0660"}
{"qid": "q08", "subject": "claude", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on how many adults in Mexico use Instagram? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:38:40Z", "secs": 28.2, "text": "**Number for your slide:** about **64.7 million Instagram users in Mexico** as of October 2026, which is roughly 45% of the population.\n\n**Source:** [NapoleonCat, Instagram users in Mexico](https://napoleoncat.com/stats/instagram-users-in-mexico/)\n\n- **Estimate, not a survey:** NapoleonCat says its values are estimates. They appear to come from Meta's advertising audience data, so I'd label it \"estimated Instagram users\" on the slide.\n- **Adults only:** The page lists the 13–17 group at 0% and says nearly all users are 18 or older. It doesn't give a separate adult count, so I wouldn't present 64.7 million as an adults-only figure. The page also doesn't give adults as a share of the adult population.\n- **Demographics:** The largest group is ages 25–34, at 37.8% of users. Women make up 53.8%. I got those two figures from an earlier search snippet and didn't check them against the page.\n- **Cross-check:** DataReportal's [Digital 2026: Mexico](https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2026-mexico) puts social media user identities in Mexico at 99.0 million (October 2025). That is all social platforms combined, not Instagram, so use it only for context.", "model_version": "claude-sonnet-5-5,claude-haiku-5-5", "num_turns": 3, "cwd": "t-31bfnjw8", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "678ae94806221eaf14e8cbb047e5355c59f9c3e7959b84c9462912bb385cf89f"}
{"qid": "q08", "subject": "gpt", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on how many adults in Mexico use Instagram? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:38:32Z", "secs": 12.6, "text": "As of late 2025, **55.1% of adults aged 18+ in Mexico used Instagram**—roughly one in two adults.\n\nSource: [DataReportal, Digital 2026: Mexico](https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2026-mexico)\n\nNote: This is based on Meta’s advertising-reach data, so it’s best presented as an estimate rather than a surveyed usage rate.", "model_version": "gpt-5.6-sol", "search_queries": 1, "cwd": "t-1sch_peo", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "ed51533b4faccec779aa3c85a6c7b0deaa0a3f1498e27e94df2977b8637e79a0"}
{"qid": "q09", "subject": "claude", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on what share of web traffic in India comes from mobile phones? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:38:54Z", "secs": 19.7, "text": "**About 84% of web traffic in India comes from mobile phones.** StatCounter puts mobile at 84.21% for October 2026, with desktop at 15.17% and tablet at 0.62%.\n\nSource: [StatCounter Global Stats, Desktop vs Mobile vs Tablet Market Share in India](https://gs.statcounter.com/platform-market-share/desktop-mobile-tablet/india)\n\n- **Other figures:** StatCounter's other India pages show lower mobile shares, from about 67% to 78% depending on the metric and month. A separate industry report I found gave 65.7% for Q1 2026. I didn't open that report, so I can't vouch for it. If anyone in the room has seen a different number, that's probably why.\n- **Slide wording:** I'd label it \"Mobile share of web traffic, India, Oct 2026 (StatCounter)\". StatCounter measures page views tracked across its network of sites, not all internet traffic.", "model_version": "claude-sonnet-5-5,claude-haiku-5-5", "num_turns": 3, "cwd": "t-md9plc91", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "9b662e259d2dbae12a5f0dfd3889e951f53e51eaeb82795a0ffccf563f3d07bf"}
{"qid": "q09", "subject": "gpt", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on what share of web traffic in India comes from mobile phones? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:38:41Z", "secs": 11.2, "text": "**84.2% of web traffic in India came from mobile phones in October 2026**, according to StatCounter Global Stats.\n\nSource: [StatCounter — Mobile vs. desktop vs. tablet market share in India](https://gs.statcounter.com/platform-market-share/mobile-desktop-tablet/india)\n\nSlide wording: “Mobile phones account for roughly 84% of web traffic in India.”", "model_version": "gpt-5.6-sol", "search_queries": 1, "cwd": "t-4ggep1hv", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "39f8647264e619e7c7b6e59f6cc45703e951b2923070cc9ffe46e8ed371ca494"}
{"qid": "q10", "subject": "claude", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on how many UK shoppers read online reviews before buying? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:39:07Z", "secs": 28.5, "text": "The best source I could confirm is a PowerReviews UK survey, but it doesn't give a clean \"read reviews before buying\" figure. Another candidate figure is one I couldn't verify.\n\n**Verified: PowerReviews, July 2022, 3,265 UK consumers**\n- **Stat:** 75% of UK shoppers read between one and 25 reviews for a product before buying.\n- **Source:** [The Importance of Review Recency and Volume Among UK Shoppers](https://www.powerreviews.com/?p=28542)\n- **Caveat:** The page doesn't give the share who read reviews at all. My first search summary said 99.75%, but the page doesn't show that number, so don't use it.\n\n**Not verified: Trustpilot**\n- **Stat:** 77% of UK online shoppers look at reviews before purchasing.\n- **Source:** [ClickZ write-up](https://clickz.com/?p=6046) of the Trustpilot survey. I couldn't find a survey date, and it looks old.\n\n**For your slide**\n- If you need a number for \"read reviews before buying\", the 77% Trustpilot figure matches best. Check the original survey's date and wording first, because it may be too old for a current deck.\n- The PowerReviews figure is dated and well-sourced, but it measures how many reviews people read, not whether they read any. On a slide it would read as \"75% of UK shoppers read 1–25 reviews before buying\".\n\nI can search for a more recent figure from 2024–2026, such as Which?, the CMA, Trustpilot or Feefo, if you want one.\n\nSources:\n- [PowerReviews: The Importance of Review Recency and Volume Among UK Shoppers](https://www.powerreviews.com/?p=28542)\n- [ClickZ: Consumers becoming more influenced by online reviews](https://clickz.com/?p=6046)", "model_version": "claude-sonnet-5-5,claude-haiku-5-5", "num_turns": 3, "cwd": "t-4ukjpay_", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "5f6c09e45a9fd126a5beae469874b9ab2aabe842a3bf4d040b8b9f0280ed779e"}
{"qid": "q10", "subject": "gpt", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on how many UK shoppers read online reviews before buying? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:38:44Z", "secs": 15.3, "text": "**71% of UK adults check customer reviews or ratings before buying from an unfamiliar online store.**\n\nSource: [YouGov, January 2026](https://yougov.com/en-gb/articles/53836-how-uk-shoppers-check-if-an-online-store-is-legit-before-purchasing) — nationally representative survey of 2,119 adults in Great Britain.", "model_version": "gpt-5.6-sol", "search_queries": 2, "cwd": "t-1i2ehouf", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "fd780032b9dfcbbd7404fbe67989729003b82b315da8f5bd09a3c528d840abda"}
{"qid": "q11", "subject": "claude", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on how many UK employees use AI at work? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:39:08Z", "secs": 19.4, "text": "**Suggested stat: nearly half (48%) of UK workers use AI at work at least weekly.** That's 20% daily plus 28% several times a week, from ADP's *People at Work 2026* research, which surveyed 1,110 UK workers.\n\nSource: [ADP, \"Nearly half of UK workers now use AI at least weekly\"](https://uk.adp.com/about-adp/press-centre/nearly-half-of-uk-workers-now-use-ai-at-least-weekly-as-users-report-lower-stress-levels.aspx)\n\nI took these figures from search results and didn't open the ADP page, so check them against the release before they go on the slide.\n\nOther figures you could use:\n- **Daily use:** PwC's 2026 Hopes and Fears survey found 19% of UK employees use AI every day, up from 15% a year earlier. [PwC press release](https://www.pwc.co.uk/press-room/press-releases/research-commentary/2026/one-in-five-uk-employees-are-now-using-ai-everyday-at-work-but-4.html)\n- **Any use:** Owl Labs reports 86% of UK employees use AI at work. That's much higher than the other surveys, so I'd treat it with caution. It came from a secondary source, and I haven't checked how it defines \"use\".\n\nSurveys define \"use\" differently, from daily to ever, so name the definition on the slide, for example \"use AI at least weekly\".\n\nSources:\n- [ADP](https://uk.adp.com/about-adp/press-centre/nearly-half-of-uk-workers-now-use-ai-at-least-weekly-as-users-report-lower-stress-levels.aspx)\n- [PwC UK](https://www.pwc.co.uk/press-room/press-releases/research-commentary/2026/one-in-five-uk-employees-are-now-using-ai-everyday-at-work-but-4.html)", "model_version": "claude-sonnet-5-5,claude-haiku-5-5", "num_turns": 2, "cwd": "t-qu3ik7xu", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "a6eddb871fcfb71dd7baf641cb146c0041e809f61e5f017de4dde6b19c1e7b2e"}
{"qid": "q11", "subject": "gpt", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on how many UK employees use AI at work? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:38:46Z", "secs": 14.7, "text": "**83% of UK employees use generative AI at work**, according to EY’s 2025 Work Reimagined Survey of 800 UK employees, published in December 2025.\n\nSource: [EY UK – Work Reimagined Survey](https://www.ey.com/en_uk/newsroom/2025/12/uk-employers-miss-40-percentage-ai-gains-talent-gaps)\n\nSlide-ready wording: “More than four in five UK employees (83%) now use generative AI at work.”", "model_version": "gpt-5.6-sol", "search_queries": 2, "cwd": "t-oxm7actw", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "947269d2bc558eaa605337a689af7d745376129c639260bb78b4046bff7e880e"}
{"qid": "q12", "subject": "claude", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on how many hours a week office workers spend in meetings? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:39:13Z", "secs": 17.1, "text": "**Suggested stat:** Office workers spend about **11.3 hours a week in meetings, roughly 28% of the workweek**.\n\n**Source:** [Laxis, State of Meetings 2026](https://laxis.com/blog/state-of-meetings-2026)\n\nSome caveats before you put it in front of a client:\n\n- **The source is a vendor report.** Laxis sells meeting software, and I only saw the figure in search results. I didn't open the report to check the methodology or sample size.\n- **Other sources give different numbers.** Secondary sites cite Calendly (2024) at about 11–12 hours a week, which matches. Hubstaff's 2026 benchmarks, as reported by [Pumble](https://pumble.com/learn/es/?p=1821), are much lower: about 4 hours for individual contributors and nearly 9 for managers.\n- **Older figures are higher.** A [2022 Fortune article](https://www.fortune.com/2022/09/27/are-business-meetings-useless-survey-remote-work-burnout-zoom/) cites about 18 hours a week.\n\nFor the slide, \"roughly 11–12 hours a week\" is safer than a single decimal. If the client is sensitive to sourcing, I can look for the primary Calendly or Microsoft Work Trend Index data.\n\nSources:\n- [Laxis, State of Meetings 2026](https://laxis.com/blog/state-of-meetings-2026)\n- [Pumble](https://pumble.com/learn/es/?p=1821)\n- [Fortune, 2022](https://www.fortune.com/2022/09/27/are-business-meetings-useless-survey-remote-work-burnout-zoom/)", "model_version": "claude-sonnet-5-5,claude-haiku-5-5", "num_turns": 2, "cwd": "t-czrt6tm2", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "f9ebc4d72af084eb913169ec9685505d196f021eb4db9d59eab8e65e6370c36f"}
{"qid": "q12", "subject": "gpt", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on how many hours a week office workers spend in meetings? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:38:52Z", "secs": 16.4, "text": "**4.7 hours per week** — about **12% of the working week**.\n\nBased on a 2025 survey of approximately 9,000 Norwegian workers, published in 2026. Source: [IZA Institute of Labor Economics](https://iza.org/publications/dp/19033/meetings).\n\nSlide wording: “The average worker spends 4.7 hours a week in meetings.”", "model_version": "gpt-5.6-sol", "search_queries": 2, "cwd": "t-7glsysru", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "5bbbb2f734dc10949183b6ab3a6883fb7b7e4ea00fd4fe255a71e9ec41e787d8"}
{"qid": "q13", "subject": "claude", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on what share of US employees work remote or hybrid? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:39:28Z", "secs": 25.5, "text": "I couldn't verify a single clean number against a primary source, so treat what follows as provisional.\n\n**Best candidate for your slide:** about **38% of US full-time employees work remote or hybrid.** That's 12% fully remote plus 26% hybrid, against 62% fully onsite. These figures come from Stanford's WFH Research survey of roughly 292,000 full-time employees over the year to May 2026. They're also secondhand. They came from blog roundups, not from Stanford directly, and I couldn't confirm them on the primary page.\n\n**Other figures that use different bases:**\n- **Gallup, remote-capable jobs only:** about 52% hybrid, 26% fully remote and 22% on-site (reported May 2026). This covers only jobs that can be done remotely, so don't present it as all US employees.\n- **BLS Current Population Survey:** about 22–23% of employees telework at least partly. The monthly figures I found conflicted, so I wouldn't rely on them.\n\n**Sources:**\n- Primary (confirmed to exist, but I didn't find the headline numbers on it): [WFH Research data page](https://wfhresearch.com/data/). The next update is due 5 December 2026.\n- Secondary (where the numbers came from): [Remote Work Statistics 2026 – VA Masters](https://vamasters.com/remote-work-statistics-2026/) and [Remote Work Statistics: 50+ Data Points for 2026 – DailyRemote](https://dailyremote.com/advice/remote-work-statistics-2026).\n\nBefore the slide goes to a client, I'd check the numbers against the WFH Research time series or Gallup's current workplace page and cite that directly. If the client cares about precision, say what the number measures, for example \"share of full-time employees\" versus \"share of remote-capable employees.\"", "model_version": "claude-sonnet-5-5,claude-haiku-5-5", "num_turns": 4, "cwd": "t-r6uqr22p", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "b4ff1d224e857145459c87f6097afd9b40b399c14b5f63e86b97ef1a089f6b27"}
{"qid": "q13", "subject": "gpt", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on what share of US employees work remote or hybrid? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:39:00Z", "secs": 16.3, "text": "**20.9% of U.S. wage-and-salary employees worked remotely or hybrid in 2025.**\n\nThat comprises **11.4% hybrid**—remote for some hours—and **9.4% fully remote** during the survey week.\n\nSource: [U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey](https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat60.htm) (2025 annual average).", "model_version": "gpt-5.6-sol", "search_queries": 2, "cwd": "t-atm24zb4", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "ea27465b8f29bc9803e02fa1aa9d0a46c0475f0ba1c9c39b8f89d2ffa453da7e"}
{"qid": "q14", "subject": "claude", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on the average cost of a data breach? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:39:30Z", "secs": 16.6, "text": "**Stat for your slide:** The global average cost of a data breach is **$4.99 million**, according to IBM's 2026 Cost of a Data Breach Report. That is a record high and up about 12% from last year.\n\n**Source:** [IBM 2026 Cost of a Data Breach Report: Key Findings (eSecurity Planet)](https://www.esecurityplanet.com/cybersecurity/ibm-2026-cost-of-a-data-breach-report-key-findings/)\n\nOther figures from the same report that you might use:\n- **U.S. average:** $11.5 million, more than double the global figure.\n- **AI-enabled breaches:** These made up about 1 in 4 malicious breaches and averaged around $6 million.\n- **Methodology:** The report covers 602 organizations, with data from March 2025 to February 2026.\n\n- **Primary source:** The link above is secondary coverage. I didn't open IBM's own report page, so for a client deck, check the number against IBM's report and cite IBM directly.\n- **Older figure:** Some pages still show $4.44 million as the current average. That was the 2025 report's number, so don't use it.", "model_version": "claude-sonnet-5-5,claude-haiku-5-5", "num_turns": 2, "cwd": "t-4te7rmye", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "5bcd17c3fbd9ef700520ca78e20dac3e803d11443f4e25c356cad8ab5f1d7095"}
{"qid": "q14", "subject": "gpt", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on the average cost of a data breach? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:39:01Z", "secs": 10.2, "text": "**$4.99 million** — the global average cost of a data breach in 2026, up 12% year over year.\n\nSource: [IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026](https://www.ibm.com/reports/data-breach)", "model_version": "gpt-5.6-sol", "search_queries": 1, "cwd": "t-4zmhk5tf", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "118cbe0997016ea632887cf656c718f7bc6ba81b46452646d567b9358e218f7a"}
{"qid": "q15", "subject": "claude", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on how many customers leave a brand after one bad service experience? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:39:35Z", "secs": 26.0, "text": "**Suggested stat: 63% of consumers say they'd be willing to switch to a competitor after just one bad experience.** It comes from Zendesk's CX Trends 2025 report, a survey of about 10,500 people in 22 countries, run June–July 2024.\n\n**Source:** [Zendesk customer service statistics](https://www.zendesk.com/it/blog/customer-service-statistics/). I couldn't open the original report, so I only saw the 63% figure quoted by secondary sources, though they agreed with each other. Check it against Zendesk's page or report before it goes on the slide.\n\nSome things to keep in mind when you word the slide:\n- **Wording:** The finding is about willingness to switch, not measured behavior. \"63% say they'd switch\" is accurate. \"63% of customers leave\" is not.\n- **Vendor survey:** Zendesk sells customer service software, and a client may notice that.\n- **The 73% figure:** You'll often see \"73% leave after one bad experience.\" Zendesk's own material ties 73% to multiple bad experiences, so I'd avoid that number for a one-incident claim.\n- **Other surveys:** Results vary a lot with the question asked. Five9 found 40% would stop doing business with a company after one bad experience. Genesys found 21%. Zendesk's 63% is at the high end, so a slide saying \"up to 63%\" or \"40–63%\" may hold up better if the client pushes back.", "model_version": "claude-sonnet-5-5,claude-haiku-5-5", "num_turns": 3, "cwd": "t-dcsaxqqu", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "b1ed9ec3f4644ddf1c89e4b0c020663574e94182917049208415d31565f5ab47"}
{"qid": "q15", "subject": "gpt", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on how many customers leave a brand after one bad service experience? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:39:09Z", "secs": 16.0, "text": "**78% of customers are likely to switch to a competitor after one terrible customer experience.**\n\nSource: Verint’s [State of Customer Experience 2025](https://www.verint.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/State-of-Customer-Experience-2025-Report.pdf), based on a survey of 5,000 U.S. consumers.\n\nSlide-ready wording: **“One bad experience can put 78% of customers at risk of switching brands.”**", "model_version": "gpt-5.6-sol", "search_queries": 2, "cwd": "t-5vdp6mow", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "559cd02fd6a9800b669cfad9e3644e669c7f71ff8a68a90d5d846298f3494098"}
{"qid": "q16", "subject": "claude", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on what share of companies in Australia have adopted AI? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:39:47Z", "secs": 25.1, "text": "Use the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) figure: **about 12% of Australian businesses used AI in 2024–25.** It comes from the ABS Business Characteristics Survey, which covered almost 7,000 businesses.\n\nThe breakdown by size may be useful for the slide:\n- **Large businesses:** about 35%\n- **Medium businesses:** 22%\n- **Small and micro businesses:** about 11%\n\n**Source:** [Cyber Daily: AI adoption surged in 2024–25, ABS reports](https://www.cyberdaily.au/digital-transformation/13820-artificial-intelligence-adoption-surged-in-2024–25-australian-bureau-of-statistics-reports)\n\nThat link is a news report on the ABS release, not the ABS page itself. For a client slide, find the original ABS Business Characteristics Survey release and cite that instead. I didn't open it.\n\nOther surveys give very different numbers, so expect questions if a client has seen one of them. A CPA Australia report said 88% of businesses use AI, and a commentary piece said only 7% use it broadly. I didn't check how either defined \"use\". The ABS number is the most defensible because it's an official, large-sample survey.", "model_version": "claude-sonnet-5-5,claude-haiku-5-5", "num_turns": 3, "cwd": "t-zb2nfqkk", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "d75af9f898a9af82fe73d6e65387c71fa50dbd777482fa3631cdb89005b79682"}
{"qid": "q16", "subject": "gpt", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on what share of companies in Australia have adopted AI? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:39:11Z", "secs": 10.7, "text": "**12% of Australian businesses used AI in the 2024–25 financial year**, up from 1% in 2021–22.\n\nSource: [Australian Bureau of Statistics — Characteristics of Australian Business, 2024–25](https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/industry/technology-and-innovation/characteristics-australian-business/latest-release)\n\nSuggested slide wording: “Almost one in eight Australian businesses used AI in 2024–25 (ABS).” The ABS measured any reported AI use, not how extensively it was deployed.", "model_version": "gpt-5.6-sol", "search_queries": 1, "cwd": "t-vjt7j3og", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "1144bd732b8401d591ff5966eb00c143d9c25d3005f7a64a2963fbdfcac8d140"}
{"qid": "q17", "subject": "claude", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on how many employees worldwide are engaged at work? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:39:53Z", "secs": 18.2, "text": "**20% of employees worldwide are engaged at work.** This comes from Gallup's *State of the Global Workplace: 2026* report, published April 2026. It uses data collected from January to December 2025.\n\nSource: [Gallup, State of the Global Workplace](https://www.gallup.com/workplace/697904/state-of-the-global-workplace.aspx)\n\nTwo points that may help on the slide:\n- **Trend:** Engagement was 21% in the prior report and peaked at 23% in 2022. A decline framing may suit your slide.\n- **Other figures:** The search coverage also gave 64% not engaged, 16% actively disengaged, and a cost of about $10 trillion in lost productivity. I confirmed only the 20% figure on Gallup's page, so check the others in the report before you use them.", "model_version": "claude-sonnet-5-5,claude-haiku-5-5", "num_turns": 3, "cwd": "t-r8y6ux4g", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "4ed5e19addd90bca9972ca1c8b1f38f2a49932a7cd3de183d6aa2b53f8006d03"}
{"qid": "q17", "subject": "gpt", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on how many employees worldwide are engaged at work? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:39:16Z", "secs": 10.0, "text": "**20% of employees worldwide were engaged at work in 2025**, down from 21% in 2024.\n\nSource: Gallup, [State of the Global Workplace 2026](https://www.gallup.com/workplace/697904/state-of-the-global-workplace-global-data.aspx).\n\nSlide wording: “Only 1 in 5 employees worldwide is engaged at work.”", "model_version": "gpt-5.6-sol", "search_queries": 1, "cwd": "t-vpa6zw61", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "4aef63bd24d0536cbf9ca62ac70df7d53517bbf0d33f1c995e9d8ab10b071fce"}
{"qid": "q18", "subject": "claude", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on how much time workers lose each week to busywork? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:40:01Z", "secs": 26.9, "text": "I'd use this one, with a caveat about its age.\n\n**Stat:** 29% of US workers spend at least 11 hours a week on busywork. That is more than 28% of their workweek. In the same survey, 17% spend more than 16 hours a week on it.\n\n**Source:** [U.S. Chamber of Commerce coverage of the survey (1,130 US workers)](https://www.uschamber.com/co/run/human-resources/busy-work-burnout). I didn't open this page. The figures come from search-result snippets, so check the publication date and the original survey firm on the page before you put it on a slide.\n\n**Caveats**\n- I couldn't confirm a 2026 survey that gives a clean \"hours per week lost to busywork\" number.\n- The most recent related source I opened is [Allwork.Space's February 2026 article](https://allwork.space/2026/02/only-31-of-workers-feel-fully-focused-as-busy-work-and-meetings-take-over-the-day), which covers a Resume Now report. It gives no weekly hours figure for busywork.\n  - It says 40% of workers spend at least a quarter of their time on repetitive or administrative work.\n  - It says 38% spend at least five hours a week in meetings.\n  - It doesn't state the sample size or the survey date.\n- Asana's well-known \"work about work\" figure is 61% of the workday. It comes from the [2021 Anatomy of Work Index](https://asana.com/es/resources/anatomy-of-work-infographic.md), so it's dated for a \"recent\" claim.\n- Busywork figures vary a lot because each survey defines it differently. On the slide, I'd attribute the number to the survey and say how it defines busywork.\n\nIf you want a firmly 2026 number, I can dig further. The Resume Now report itself is the likely place to look.\n\nSources:\n- [U.S. Chamber of Commerce: Busy Work Burnout](https://www.uschamber.com/co/run/human-resources/busy-work-burnout)\n- [Allwork.Space, Feb 2026](https://allwork.space/2026/02/only-31-of-workers-feel-fully-focused-as-busy-work-and-meetings-take-over-the-day)\n- [Asana Anatomy of Work Index 2021](https://asana.com/es/resources/anatomy-of-work-infographic.md)", "model_version": "claude-sonnet-5-5,claude-haiku-5-5", "num_turns": 4, "cwd": "t-vb_z70ma", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "27b4fb5beda82198b4c1a1e1f372a3a9699139e110e09f3baf6c2612e4632e05"}
{"qid": "q18", "subject": "gpt", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on how much time workers lose each week to busywork? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:39:22Z", "secs": 18.7, "text": "A strong recent figure: **knowledge workers spend 53% of their time on busywork**—roughly **21 hours in a 40-hour week**.\n\nSource: [Asana, State of Work Innovation 2024](https://assets.asana.biz/m/7247625de89a76e6/original/State-of-Work-Innovation-2024_Global.pdf), based on research involving more than 13,000 knowledge workers across six countries.", "model_version": "gpt-5.6-sol", "search_queries": 3, "cwd": "t-guwl8xha", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "78c0bbd1550a2084cfce075c938cc87afdfccca155cc32449dfb73497745071f"}
{"qid": "q19", "subject": "claude", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on what share of small businesses in Canada fail in their first five years? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:40:11Z", "secs": 31.3, "text": "**Suggested number: about 63% of new Canadian firms survive five years, so roughly 37% fail.** This comes from a federal government (ISED) study of firms started between 2002 and 2014. It also found that 43% survive ten years.\n\n**Source:** [ISED publication, 2018 (PDF)](https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2018/isde-ised/Iu188-131-2018-eng.pdf)\n\n**Caveats before this goes on a slide:**\n- **I couldn't open the PDF.** The 63% figure comes from search-result summaries, not from my reading the document. Please check the exact wording, cohort and definition of \"firm\" in the PDF before you cite it.\n- **It isn't very recent.** The data stops at the 2014 cohorts. I didn't find a newer national five-year figure.\n- **Other numbers are in circulation.** One is 67.9% from BDC, which I saw only in a [Manitoba Chamber of Commerce post](https://mbchamber.mb.ca/2023/10/16/small-business-week-interesting-facts-about-smes-in-canada/). Another is 51%, from a [blog](https://blog.firstreference.com/tag/bdc/) citing a CPA study. I couldn't trace either to an original source, so I'd avoid them.\n- **Don't flip the number without saying so.** If you show \"37% fail\", label it as \"did not survive five years\". Exits include sales and mergers, not only bankruptcies.\n\nSources:\n- [ISED publication (2018)](https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2018/isde-ised/Iu188-131-2018-eng.pdf)\n- [Manitoba Chamber of Commerce: Interesting Facts About SMEs in Canada](https://mbchamber.mb.ca/2023/10/16/small-business-week-interesting-facts-about-smes-in-canada/)\n- [First Reference blog (BDC tag)](https://blog.firstreference.com/tag/bdc/)", "model_version": "claude-sonnet-5-5,claude-haiku-5-5", "num_turns": 4, "cwd": "t-683txrrf", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "e1dd24fb80ed8092327b083544e4e321e8233fec4d825f8e0379aee52e842288"}
{"qid": "q19", "subject": "gpt", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on what share of small businesses in Canada fail in their first five years? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:39:25Z", "secs": 12.9, "text": "About **one-third of new Canadian small businesses close within five years**.\n\nThe latest federal data show five-year survival rates of **67.5% for service businesses** and **69.7% for goods-producing businesses**—equivalent to closure rates of **32.5% and 30.3%**, respectively.\n\nSlide-ready wording: **“Roughly 1 in 3 Canadian small businesses do not survive their first five years.”**\n\nSource: [Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada — Key Small Business Statistics 2025](https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/sme-research-statistics/en/key-small-business-statistics/key-small-business-statistics-2025)\n\n“Do not survive” means no longer operating; it does not necessarily mean bankruptcy.", "model_version": "gpt-5.6-sol", "search_queries": 1, "cwd": "t-p2e5ci6h", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "362e7c1b5f78185ff13bdef88cb1ff489974eebd2b2e677576e227c2a887df6e"}
{"qid": "q20", "subject": "claude", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on how many people in Japan use mobile payments? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:40:12Z", "secs": 22.5, "text": "**Best single stat: PayPay has 75 million registered users in Japan, as of August 9, 2026.** PayPay is Japan's largest mobile payment app. Source: [PayPay press release, Aug 10, 2026](https://about.paypay.ne.jp/en/pr/20260810/01/).\n\n- **What it measures:** This is registered accounts for one app, not unique people using mobile payments overall. Users can also hold several apps, such as Rakuten Pay or d Payment. Trade coverage, such as [Payment Navi](https://paymentnavi.com/?p=180136), says it's roughly one in two people in Japan. I didn't verify that share against the press release.\n- **Slide wording:** I'd label it \"PayPay registered users\" rather than \"mobile payment users in Japan.\"\n- **No national survey figure:** I couldn't find a survey of how many people in Japan use mobile payments in total. If you need that, I can search further.\n\n**Broader context stat:** Japan's cashless payment ratio reached 58.0% in 2025, up from 42.8% in 2024 ([METI, March 2026](https://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2026/0331_005.html)). One analysis says METI changed its denominator, and that the old-style measure would put 2025 at about 46.3%. This figure covers all cashless methods, including cards, not just mobile.\n\nSources:\n- [PayPay press release, Aug 10, 2026](https://about.paypay.ne.jp/en/pr/20260810/01/)\n- [Payment Navi: PayPay registered users surpass 75 million](https://paymentnavi.com/?p=180136)\n- [METI press release, March 2026](https://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2026/0331_005.html)", "model_version": "claude-sonnet-5-5,claude-haiku-5-5", "num_turns": 3, "cwd": "t-4xi6tnh0", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "2ca234eec4f195bbb07aa4613f25ec953e52ce47bc39a4ca5eaa8ae521196037"}
{"qid": "q20", "subject": "gpt", "prompt": "I'm putting together a slide for a client presentation. What's a good recent statistic on how many people in Japan use mobile payments? Give me the number and a link to the source.", "error": null, "started_utc": "2026-11-08T14:39:26Z", "secs": 17.7, "text": "**About 75% of Japan’s primary smartphone users used a mobile-payment app in the previous year**, according to a February 2025 MyVoice survey.\n\nSlide wording: *“Three in four smartphone users in Japan use mobile payments.”*\n\nSource: [MyVoice Mobile Payments Survey, February 2025](https://myel.myvoice.jp/products/list?category_id=1080) (Japanese; see “モバイル決済（第9回）”).", "model_version": "gpt-5.6-sol", "search_queries": 2, "cwd": "t-pirhjjtr", "attempts": 1, "text_sha256": "ff8b4245e96b76059730f935deefb0903f8891e1b9156d6b9f65e2c719272b6b"}